Reference Library

A December 2019 report from the JASON Group commissioned by NSF. The report outlines that concerns of foreign influence can be addressed within the framework of research integrity and, in addition, that the benefits of openness in research and of the inclusion of foreign researchers dictate against measures that would restrict fundamental research. The report includes questions for researchers to consider when entering a collaboration [Section 7.3 Assessment Tools: pages 34-36].

An ASPI report (released 2019) accompanying the China Defense Universities Tracker that explores the military and security links of China's universities. It provides analysis underpinning the searchable database that rates the risk of collaboration with Chinese research entities, helping institutions assess foreign collaboration risk.

Issued July 10, 2019. Reminds institutions receiving NIH funding of the requirement for researchers to disclose all sources of support for their research endeavors, regardless of the source, value, or whether monetary or in-kind, and to disclose all scientific appointments and positions, whether foreign or domestic, paid or unpaid, etc. The notice also reminds the extramural community of the requirement to comply with HHS regulations regarding Financial Conflicts of Interest, as well as the requirement to report all Foreign Components involved in NIH-supported activities.

A reference (2019) that can be utilized for advice and guidance which supports the integrity of the system of international research collaboration.

A searchable database that provides ratings on 'risk' for collaboration with an entity. In addition to the tracker, an associated document (released in 2019): Exploring the military and security links of China's universities.

Signed into law July 26, 2018. Section 1286 directs the Secretary of Defense to establish an initiative to work with IHEs who perform defense research and engineering activities and name an academic liaison. It also directed DoD to publish a list of institutions and foreign talent recruitment programs that have perpetuated malicious activities or that operate under the direction of the military forces or the intelligence agency of the applicable country and thus pose a threat to national security. The resulting list is updated annually.

The 'Wolf Amendment' (2011) prohibits participation, collaboration, or coordination bilaterally with China or any Chinese-owned company on any NASA project at the prime or subrecipient level. NASA clarified in a September 2022 presentation that the agency defines a 'Chinese-owned company' as any company owned by China, or any company incorporated under the laws of China, and that Chinese universities and similar institutions are considered to be incorporated under the laws of China and therefore the funding restrictions apply.

A foundational federal document from September 1985 issued by the Office of the President that outlined a national policy of openness in federally-funded fundamental research, including the fundamental research exclusion.

The APLU homepage providing access to research security resources and advocacy materials from the Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities.

The G7 research security portal providing resources and coordination among G7 member nations (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, and United States) on research security best practices and policies.

DoD's Basic Research and Research Directorate portal providing access to fundamental research policies, the decision matrix, Section 1286 lists, and research security guidance for defense-funded research.

DOE's Research, Technology & Economic Security (RTES) portal providing access to policies, frameworks, and resources for managing research security risks in DOE-funded research.

For applicants, recipients, and subrecipients that are required to submit transparency of foreign connections disclosures, DOE provides this format for the convenience of the entity providing the disclosure and certification; however, the entity is not required to use this specific format. If another format is used, the signatory must include the same substantive information, a signature, date, and the certification statement provided in Section 3 of the document.

NIH's research security portal providing access to notices, policies, decision matrices, and resources related to identifying and addressing foreign interference in NIH-funded research.

NSF's research security portal providing access to policies, forms, training resources, and guidance related to research security at the National Science Foundation.

The ODNI research security portal providing resources, threat briefings, and guidance for the academic research community on protecting research from foreign intelligence threats.

COGR's homepage providing access to research security resources, matrices, quick reference tables, and policy analysis for research institutions navigating federal research security requirements.

AAMC's portal for research security resources, providing guidance and advocacy materials on research security and foreign influence at U.S. academic institutions.

The Federal Demonstration Partnership homepage, a cooperative initiative among federal agencies and institutional recipients of federal funds working to streamline the administration of federally sponsored research.

The AAU homepage providing access to research security resources, policy statements, and advocacy materials from the Association of American Universities.