Skip to content
This site is under development. Content and features may change.

Reference Library

Browse and search all federal research security policies, guidance, and compliance requirements.

Showing 25 of 145 items — page 4 of 6
Department of Defense|
Active

Issued June 29, 2023 by DoD. The document includes: 1. A Policy on Risk-based Security Reviews of Fundamental Research, 2. A Decision Matrix to Inform Fundamental Research Proposal Mitigation (Amended May 5, 2025), 3. A list of foreign institutions identified as engaging in problematic activity (Part 3, Table 1, Amended June 24, 2025), and 4. A list of foreign talent recruitment programs identified as posing a threat to U.S. national security interests (Part 3, Table 2). The Decision Matrix contains four factors for assessing senior/key personnel disclosures: a. Participation in foreign talent recruitment programs, b. Current or prior funding from foreign countries of concern (FCOCs), c. Filing a patent in an FCOC or on behalf of an FCOC-connected entity, or in a non-FCOC country, without disclosure, and d. Associations or affiliations with organizations on U.S. Entity (trade restriction) and other indicated (U.S. restricted) lists.

Agency Disclosure PoliciesAgency Risk Review ProcessesMitigation Strategies
National Institutes of Health (NIH)|
Active

Issued June 12, 2023, this Notice implements additional disclosure and post-award reporting requirements for small business concerns (SBCs) participating in the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs regarding covered relationships. It also serves as notification of NIH's due diligence program to assess security risks and to deny award where foreign relationships meet the risk criteria prohibiting funding. The requirements apply to competing applications submitted for due dates on or after September 5, 2023.

Agency Disclosure PoliciesPost-Award ReportingAgency Risk Review Processes
National Academies|
ActiveFederal

A June 2023 report issued by the National Academies providing recommendations that U.S. institutions of higher education can take to identify and mitigate risks associated with foreign-funded language and culture institutes on campus. A companion highlights summary is also available.

Confucius Institute & Entity Restrictions
National Academies|
ActiveFederal

A highlights summary of the National Academies' June 2023 report on foreign-funded language and culture institutes at U.S. institutions of higher education. It condenses the practices and recommendations institutions can use to identify and mitigate risks associated with such institutes on campus.

Confucius Institute & Entity Restrictions
JASON Group (commissioned by NSF)|
Active

A March 2023 report issued by JASON and commissioned by NSF. Provides definitions of Research Integrity as adherence to accepted values and principles -- objectivity, honesty, openness, accountability, fairness, and stewardship -- that guide the conduct of research. Research Security is protecting the means, know-how, and products of research until they are ready to be shared. JASON suggests research security does not vary across disciplines, but the consequences of breaches in research security and the measures taken to prevent breaches will differ. Key points include an emphasis on training researchers on risks in international collaborations, the need to encourage collaboration with international organizations that are also concerned with research security, and avoiding creating a reputation of racial profiling or using the research security programs to disadvantage anyone based on ethnicity or nationality.

Research Security Reports & AssessmentsG7 & Multilateral Initiatives
OSTP / NSTC Research Security Subcommittee|
SupersededFederal

Draft standards for research security programs published for comment in February 2023 by OSTP/the NSTC Research Security Subcommittee. The document was superseded by the final standard guidelines published on July 9, 2024. The following are related documents and comments from higher education associations.

RSP Standards & Guidelines
NASA|
Active

The NASA Proposer's Guide (February 2023) includes similar language to the Wolf Amendment in a footnote of section 2.16, Current and Pending Support. Per the footnote, 'China or Chinese-owned Company' means the People's Republic of China (PRC), any company owned by the PRC, or any company incorporated under the laws of the PRC. Chinese universities and other similar institutions are considered to be incorporated under the laws of the PRC and, therefore, the funding restrictions apply to grants and cooperative agreements that include bilateral participation, collaboration, or coordination with Chinese universities.

Common Disclosure Forms
NSF|
Active

February 2023. Outlines advanced monitoring and verification activities of NSF proposals and awards. The guidelines largely serve to provide transparency and identify guardrails NSF has put in place around the use of data analytics to monitor and validate information disclosed (e.g., in biosketches and current and pending support). For example, the activities are not investigative and cannot be incorporated into the merit review process. Sources of information include SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Database.

Agency Disclosure PoliciesAgency Risk Review Processes
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine|
Active

Issued in January 2023 by the National Academies, this report outlines recommended conditions that should be in place for the Department of Defense to consider granting a waiver to allow an institution of higher education (IHE) hosting a Confucius Institute (CI) to continue receiving agency funding, as contemplated under the FY2020 NDAA. A companion highlights summary is also available.

Confucius Institute & Entity RestrictionsNDAA Provisions
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine|
ActiveFederal

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's National Science, Technology, and Security Roundtable, called for in the Fiscal Year 2020 National Defense Authorization Act, explored issues related to protecting U.S. national and economic security while ensuring the open exchange of ideas and the international talent.

Research Security Reports & AssessmentsInternational Research Security Policy
NSF (in collaboration with NIH, DoE, DoD, FBI)|
ActiveFederal

Research security training developed by institutions and organizations under cooperative agreements funded by NSF in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Energy (DoE), and Department of Defense (DoD), with engagement from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The training consists of 4 modules: 1.) What is Research Security?; 2.) Disclosure; 3.) Manage and Mitigate Risk; 4.) International Collaboration.

Federal Training Modules
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine|
Active

A highlights summary of the National Academies' January 2023 report on waiver criteria for the Department of Defense regarding institutions of higher education that host a Confucius Institute. It condenses the recommended conditions the report suggests should be in place for DoD to consider granting a waiver allowing a hosting institution to continue receiving agency funding.

Confucius Institute & Entity RestrictionsNDAA Provisions
U.S. Congress|
ActiveFederal

September 2022. Requires agencies to implement a due diligence program to assess security risks for SBIR and STTR proposals. Disclosure requirements include information on foreign ties, business relationships, investment, and ownership. [Source: AAU, January 2024].

Agency Disclosure PoliciesOther Authorization Acts
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), via Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP)|
Active

A September 2022 NASA presentation (at 49:32 in the recorded Federal Demonstration Partnership federal agency updates session) in which NASA clarified how it applies the Wolf Amendment restriction. NASA explained that it defines a 'Chinese-owned company' as any company owned by China, or any company incorporated under the laws of China, and that Chinese universities and similar institutions are considered to be incorporated under the laws of China and are therefore subject to the funding restrictions.

International Research Security PolicyOther Authorization Acts
CHIPS and Science Act|
ActiveFederal

OSTP to issue guidance to Federal research agencies to prohibit participation in 'foreign talent recruitment programs' by agency personnel and provide additional clarification to the research community regarding which activities are considered 'foreign talent recruitment programs.' OSTP is also directed to issue guidance clarifying that researchers working on Federally supported research projects must disclose participation in FTRPs in Federal research award proposals. OSTP is further directed to issue guidance for Federal research agencies to prohibit researchers working on agency-funded projects from participating in 'malign foreign talent recruitment programs,' and certify both at the time of proposal and annually that they are not part of a malign foreign talent recruitment program.

Talent Recruitment Programs
U.S. Congress|
ActiveFederal

Signed into law in August 2022, the CHIPS and Science Act includes a number of research security provisions. Key sections address research security at DOE, NIST cybersecurity guidance, NSF Office of Research Security and Policy, research security training requirements, information sharing analysis organizations, Confucius Institute restrictions, foreign financial support reporting, and foreign talent recruitment program requirements.

CHIPS Act Provisions
CHIPS and Science Act|
Active

DOE Office of Science to develop and maintain tools and processes to manage and mitigate research security risks such as an S&T risk matrix, informed by threats identified by the Office of Defense National Intelligence (ODNI).

Risk Assessment Tools & FrameworksCHIPS Act Provisions