Research Security Reports & Assessments

A December 2019 report from the JASON Group commissioned by NSF. The report outlines that concerns of foreign influence can be addressed within the framework of research integrity and, in addition, that the benefits of openness in research and of the inclusion of foreign researchers dictate against measures that would restrict fundamental research. The report includes questions for researchers to consider when entering a collaboration [Section 7.3 Assessment Tools: pages 34-36].

NSF's formal response to the JASON Group's report on Fundamental Research Security, outlining how the Foundation plans to address the report's findings and recommendations.

A March 2024 report commissioned by NSF and issued by the JASON group. Recommends NSF adopt a dynamic approach for identifying potentially sensitive research topics as they arise and weigh the balance between the protective benefits and the unintended negative consequences of controls on sensitive research. It is suggested that the identification of sensitive projects proposed to NSF occurs most naturally before peer or panel review. Specific mitigation strategies for sensitive research projects should be negotiated and agreed upon by the principal investigator (PI), NSF, and the institution and be proportionate to the assessed risk, relative to the associated costs.

A summary of the NSF-funded workshop 'Responsible Collaboration Through Appropriate Research Security' held at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy in May 2024. Discusses challenges and opportunities in the emerging field of RoRS and provides recommendations to guide NSF's new RoRS program.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's National Science, Technology, and Security Roundtable, called for in the Fiscal Year 2020 National Defense Authorization Act, explored issues related to protecting U.S. national and economic security while ensuring the open exchange of ideas and the international talent.

Published September 3, 2025, a National Academies Committee conducted an expedited study to examine federal research regulations and identify ways to improve regulatory processes and administrative tasks, reduce or eliminate unnecessary work, and modify and remove policies and regulations that have outlived their purpose while maintaining necessary and appropriate integrity, accountability, and oversight. Research security specific options include: implement the NSPM-33 common disclosure forms and disclosure table without deviation; establish common principles for agency research security risk reviews for fundamental research; continue prior efforts to streamline and clarify export controls; and adapt cybersecurity requirements for university settings.

The National Academies Assessing Research Security Efforts in Higher Education working group held a number of meetings and a May workshop with federal and non-federal experts beginning September 2024 and concluding September 4, 2025, to discuss assessment of federal research security efforts. Proceedings from the workshop can be found on the National Academies website.

A March 2023 report issued by JASON and commissioned by NSF. Provides definitions of Research Integrity as adherence to accepted values and principles -- objectivity, honesty, openness, accountability, fairness, and stewardship -- that guide the conduct of research. Research Security is protecting the means, know-how, and products of research until they are ready to be shared. JASON suggests research security does not vary across disciplines, but the consequences of breaches in research security and the measures taken to prevent breaches will differ. Key points include an emphasis on training researchers on risks in international collaborations, the need to encourage collaboration with international organizations that are also concerned with research security, and avoiding creating a reputation of racial profiling or using the research security programs to disadvantage anyone based on ethnicity or nationality.